President
George W. Bush recently signed the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
& Consumer Protection Act of 2005,("BAPCOP").
The new law takes effect October 17, 2005.
"By restoring integrity to the bankruptcy process,
this law will make our financial system stronger and better,"
Bush said in a news conference.
That
sounds reassuring. However, everything in today's financial
and economic systems are intertwined, and no one action
provides a complete path toward improvement.
The
following explores some of the history and implications
relating to bankruptcy and the new regulations.
The first official laws concerning bankruptcy were passed
by England in 1542, under Henry VIII. A bankrupt individual
was considered a criminal, subject to criminal punishment.
Potential penalties ranged from incarceration to death.
U.
S. bankruptcy laws for the protection of debtors were first
enacted in 1800. However, the foundation of modern bankruptcy
law and practices in the United States began with the Bankruptcy
Act of 1898.
The
economic turmoil of the late 1920's and early 30's spawned
more bankruptcy legislation, notably, the Bankruptcy Act
of 1933 and the Bankruptcy Act of 1934. This legislation
culminated with the Chandler Act of 1938. From 1938 to the
present day, bankruptcy laws and procedural rules continued
to be refined.
The
Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 created Chapter 11 reorganization
and a more powerful form of personal bankruptcy, Chapter
13. In 1986, Chapter 12 was created for family farms.
Enter
now BAPCOP of 2005. The American Bankruptcy Institute estimated
that up to 210,000 people will be affected by BAPCOP --
unless they file for bankruptcy before October 17.
The
major modifications provided by this Act are as follows.
Income
test. Income is subject to a two-part "means test"
to determine if the debtor can afford to pay 25 percent
of their "non-priority unsecured debt" such as
credit card bills. Then income will be compared to the debtor's
median income. If income is above the state's median and
the debtor can afford to pay 25 percent of the unsecured
debt, the debtor may not be allowed to file under Chapter
7 liquidation. However, Chapter 13 reorganization may still
be available.
Charitable
tithing. Up to 15% of one's income can be given to charity;
a possible loophole allowing people who may be just over
the threshold of having to file Chapter 13 to drop down
low enough to file Chapter 7.
Child
support and alimony. These debts become number one on
the priority list as opposed to 7th under the old law.
Homestead
exemption. Currently, some states allow debtors to protect
some or all of their home's equity from creditors. The new
Act, however, places more stringent restrictions on the
homestead exemption.
Creditors'
rights. Currently, creditors who won't receive any money
owed in a bankruptcy case may contest the ruling if it's
a Chapter 7 case, but not if it's Chapter 13. Creditors
may now challenge Chapter 13 filings as well.
Liability
for lawyers. Under the new law, bankruptcy attorneys
may be subject to various fees and fines if the filings
are found to be inaccurate. The increased liability will
make lawyers less willing to accept bankruptcy cases and
if they do, costs will no doubt be higher.
Credit
counseling. In a provision similar to required parenting
classes in divorce cases, the new bankruptcy law requires
credit counseling in the six months prior to applying for
bankruptcy, and money management classes. The debtor pays
for these classes.
Multiple
filings. The time between effective Chapter 7 bankruptcy
filings in creases from six years to eight years.
Automatic
disclosure. Additional disclosures are required from
debtors. Although debtors need to provide trustees with
essentially any documents concerning their financial history
under Bankruptcy Rule 2004, this Act makes the disclosures
automatic, required and mandatory. Otherwise the case will
be dismissed.
Audits.
Random audits performed by certified or licensed public
accountants must be done on .04 percent of filings of personal
Chapter 7 and 13 cases, and on cases that vary from statistical
norms. Furthermore, the discharge of debts may be denied
if the debtor fails to cooperate with the auditor.
The
results of these changes in the law will of course not be
known for several years and opinions about the new law are
expectedly varied.
Bob
Waldschmidt, former president of the National Association
of Bankruptcy Trustees, called the up-front credit counseling
requirement a waste of time, but likes the bill's requirement
that, before leaving bankruptcy, filers take a course in
managing household finances.
"This
is not going to be as drastic as people make it out to be,"
he said. Still, he added, "the system is going to get
more expensive and burdened with more work."