President
Barack Obama on July 21 signed into law one of the biggest
pieces of financial legislation in the nation's history.
H.R. 4173, the "Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act," became law at 11:30 a.m. on that Wednesday
morning.
The
document is 2,319 pages long, which is roughly two Stephen
King novels, or almost five reams of paper.
The
legislation is so broad that it leaves to regulators the
task of conducting pivotal studies, defining core terms
and drafting comprehensive rules, regulations and exceptions
that will answer many open questions the bill raised. The
bill calls for 47 studies, 74 reports and seven new government
bodies or departments.
But,
even in the face of its almost overwhelming scope and two-year
time frame to implement, there's at least one piece of immediate
relief - and it could help stimulate the elusive economic
recovery.
That
relief is that non-accelerated filers (companies with a
market capitalization of less than $75 million) are now
exempt from Sarbanes-Oxley 404(b) compliance.
The
exemption should reduce administrative compliance costs
for smaller public companies, and generate a renewed willingness
to raise capital through initial public offerings.
In
the wake of the Enron, Tyco, WorldCom and Global Crossing
accounting scandals, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX"),
was created in the hope of increasing control over financial
reporting.
While
many of SOX's requirements are considered to have been in
the interest of investors and companies, Section 404 placed
a disproportionately large expense burden on smaller public
companies. These cost burdens redirect scarce resources
away from job creation and investment.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Section 404(a) requires a management report on internal
controls and Section 404(b) requires an external audit of
internal controls.
Companies of all sizes currently provide the Section 404(a)
management report on internal control.
However,
small public companies haven't been subject to the Sarbox
404(b) requirement.
About
one-half of the approximately 10,000 public companies in
the United States fall below the $75 million market cap
threshold, and won't have to engage (and, of course, pay)
their independent auditors to attest to the adequacy of
their internal controls.
Note:
Market cap is the total dollar market value of all of a
company's outstanding shares. It's calculated by multiplying
a company's shares outstanding by the current market price
of one share.
In
2007, Financial Executives International, a 15,000-member
organization of financial executives and policy makers based
in Florham Park, N.J., with additional offices in Washington,
D.C., and Toronto, reported that:
o
Companies were required to dedicate an average of 11,100
people hours internally to comply with Section 404. (That
equates to more than five full-time people.)
o
An average of 1,244 external people hours were required
to comply.
o
Accelerated filers paid an average of $846,000 in external
auditor attestation fees in 2007.
Even
the Securities and Exchange Commission was concerned about
the possible burdensome nature of the cost of compliance.
According to a 2009 SEC study, Section 404 costs companies
an average of $2.3 million each year in direct compliance
costs.
Moreover,
the study found that the long-term burden on companies with
less than $150 million in public float is greater than seven
times that imposed on large firms.
In
other words, the burden on smaller companies is proportionately
seven times larger than on larger firms. Many investors
would rather see the smaller company's resources be expended
toward growth, not section 404(b) compliance.
In
addition to reducing administrative costs for smaller companies,
it's hoped that this permanent exemption will re-motivate
capital acquisition by increasing the number of IPOs.
Renaissance
Capital of Greenwich, Conn., in a 2009 report said IPO issuances
in 2008 and 2009 were lower than in any period since the
1970s, when business creation struggled against inflation,
high interest rates and the Vietnam War.
Additionally,
data compiled by Jay Ritter, an economics professor at the
University of Florida, show the number of U.S. IPOs was
lower in every year after SOX was enacted in 2002 (2003
to present) than in every year of the decade from 1991 to
2000, including the early 1990s recession years. For instance,
in the boom post-SOX year of 2006, there were 162 U.S. IPOs.
Yet in 1991, a year when the U.S. was mired in recession
but didn't have SOX, there were 295 U.S. IPOs.
As
the mammoth work commences to implement the new Dodd-Frank
bill, this tiny, one-sentence exemption may provide one
of the most powerful economic incentives yet.